Your cart is currently empty!
European Heart Journal Article | Published 13 December 2023
The recent article authored by Siontis et al.1 has made considerable contributions to the ongoing debate concerning the pre-market clinical evaluation of implantable medical devices in Europe, with a particular focus on the cardiovascular domain.
The study encompassed seven different classes of devices over a span of 20 years, providing comprehensive details regarding study design, patient demographics, interventions, and primary outcomes. This information was critically evaluated in relation to the timing of the corresponding CE-mark approval, offering valuable insights that can shape the design of clinical investigations for novel devices.
However, it is important to acknowledge certain reservations about the conclusions drawn in the article:
Firstly, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) design is not always a feasible or ethical option. While RCTs remain a cornerstone of evidence-based medicine, they may present practical and ethical challenges in the context of medical device evaluations, especially in the case of vulnerable populations like children.2 As an alternative, prospective cohort studies and adaptive design trials have gained prominence due to their capacity to enhance result generalizability and explore individual variations and causal mechanisms.3,4